Bankruptcy Court Rejects $8 Billion Johnson & Johnson Talc Settlement

A U.S. bankruptcy court has rejected Johnson & Johnson’s $8 billion talc settlement proposal, which would have resolved all current and future ovarian cancer claims against the company. The court determined that the proposal lacked sufficient support from those affected.
Tens of thousands of victims have filed lawsuits alleging that J&J’s talc products were contaminated with asbestos and caused ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, and other serious illnesses.
The ruling means that victims will be allowed to move forward with their lawsuits and pursue full compensation without the restrictions that come with bankruptcy.
While Johnson & Johnson has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, the company has spent years trying to limit its legal liabilities through multiple failed bankruptcy attempts and other tactics.
J&J had argued that its bankruptcy approach would streamline the resolution of claims and provide quicker payouts to victims. However, critics said it was a tactic to avoid full accountability and protect J&J’s assets since bankrupt companies can’t be sued.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with cancer after using J&J’s talcum powder products, you may be eligible for compensation. Get started now with a free case review.
Johnson & Johnson Settlement Update: Bankruptcy Bid Denied Again
On March 31, 2025, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez of the Southern District of Texas rejected Johnson & Johnson’s third attempt to resolve talcum powder lawsuits through bankruptcy.
The company had proposed an $8 billion Johnson and Johnson ovarian cancer lawsuit settlement through a subsidiary called Red River Talc LLC to resolve over 60,000 claims.
In rejecting the proposal, Judge Lopez found that:
- J&J didn’t have enough support from ovarian cancer victims
- The company’s process of obtaining settlement approval from 75% of claimants was flawed, as the voting period was too short and many ballots were invalid
- The plan went too far in shielding retailers that sold J&J’s talc products from litigation
The decision marks the third time J&J’s strategy to use bankruptcy as a way to resolve talc-related asbestos claims has been rejected by the courts.
Call (888) 726-9160 right now or chat with a case manager to see if you may qualify for compensation from a Johnson and Johnson settlement.
Understanding the Johnson and Johnson Bankruptcy Strategy
At the heart of Johnson & Johnson’s legal strategy is the “Texas Two-Step” — a bankruptcy tactic sometimes used by large corporations to avoid paying full compensation in mass tort lawsuits while protecting their main business.
Johnson & Johnson executed the Texas two-step by:
- Creating a subsidiary under Texas state law that allowed the company to split into two separate businesses
- Assigning all liabilities related to talc lawsuits to the subsidiary
- Having the subsidiary file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which paused the litigation
Meanwhile, Johnson & Johnson, which is worth nearly $400 billion, remained untouched, continuing to do business as usual.
The idea behind the maneuver was to resolve claims through the bankruptcy system, where asbestos settlement payouts could be controlled and capped.
Those opposed claimed the tactic abused the bankruptcy system and was simply a way for J&J to avoid taking responsibility for harming consumers. A pair of federal judges agreed, finding the company too financially healthy to justify bankruptcy protection.
What the Johnson and Johnson Asbestos Settlement Rejection Means for Victims
The most recent rejection of Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder and asbestos bankruptcy plan is a major win for plaintiffs who claim they developed ovarian cancer from the company’s baby powder.
Victims will now be allowed to continue with their lawsuits and seek the compensation they deserve for medical bills, lost wages, and more.
J&J talc products have been linked to:
- Mesothelioma
- Ovarian cancer
- Lung cancer
- Stomach cancer
- Uterine cancer
By dismissing the $8 billion Johnson and Johnson ovarian cancer settlement that opponents said provided too little too late, there’s now a path forward for victims to pursue full compensation through the justice system.
In response to the ruling, Johnson & Johnson said it wouldn’t appeal the decision but would litigate what it called “meritless talc claims.”
The company continues to deny that its talc products cause cancer, even though it has already paid out billions of dollars in talcum powder settlements and verdicts.
Get Help From a J&J Talcum Powder Lawyer
Companies like Johnson & Johnson should pay the price for selling dangerous products and putting consumers in harm’s way.
At LawFirm.com, we’ve partnered with experienced asbestos lawyers who can stand up to this powerful company and fight for the justice families deserve.
Together, our legal partners have secured over $10.2 billion in asbestos compensation for families nationwide.
- Are able to help families in all 50 states
- Can determine the talc products that made you sick
- Don’t charge any upfront costs or hourly fees
- Handle all of the work involved in a talcum powder claim
Call (888) 726-9160 right now or fill out our form to take the first step toward the justice and compensation you deserve.

Fact-Checked and Legally Reviewed by: Rae Theodore
Rae Theodore is a writer and editor with more than 30 years of experience in legal publishing. She earned a bachelor’s degree in English from Pennsylvania State University.
- Johnson & Johnson. “Johnson & Johnson to Return to Tort System to Defeat Meritless Talc Claims.” Retrieved from https://www.jnj.com/media-center/press-releases/johnson-johnson-to-return-to-tort-system-to-defeat-meritless-talc-claims. Accessed on April 22, 2025.
- Reuters. “US judge rejects J&J’s $10 billion baby powder settlement.” Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/us-judge-rejects-jjs-10-billion-baby-powder-settlement-2025-04-01/#. Accessed on April 22, 2025.
- Sokolove Law. “$8 Billion J&J Talc Bankruptcy Settlement Rejected by Judge.” Retrieved from https://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/johnson-johnson-bankruptcy-update-talc-settlement-rejected. Accessed on April 22, 2025.